GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition vs GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

Winner
GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

79

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

77

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition

External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Shoots 4K movies
Movie format
4K @ 12fps
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
5 mm
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
 

Reasons to buy the GoPro HERO3 Black Edition

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
30 fps
Weight
Light-weight
73 g
Movie format
Shoots 4K movies
4K @ 12fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 34 sample photos taken by the GoPro HERO3 Black Edition.
Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition.

competitors

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition Competitors

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$249 - $347

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4

Waterproof

$335 - $349

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much worse wide angle
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870

Waterproof

$337

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much worse wide angle

GoPro HERO3 Black Edition Competitors

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

Waterproof

$477

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Fujifilm X-A2

Fujifilm X-A2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$492 body only

$569 with 16-50mm lens

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80

Waterproof

$170

Built-in flash Built-in flash
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Wide angle Much worse wide angle

discussion

GoPro Hero 3+ Black Edition
Hero 3+ Black Edition
GoPro

Report a correction
GoPro HERO3 Black Edition
HERO3 Black Edition
GoPro

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments