Nikon D3 vs Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

Winner
Nikon D3

119

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

65

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon D3

Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
2,290 ISO
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Has live view
Live view
Preview your photos
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro

Size
Really small
Professional size (147×113×74 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.9"
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/8000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D3.

competitors

Nikon D3 Competitors

Nikon D3S

Nikon D3S

Pro DSLR

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Movie format Shoots movies
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,380 - $1,497 body only

$1,956 - $1,997 with 24-120mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon D700

Nikon D700

Pro DSLR

$105 body only

Size Significantly smaller
Low light performance Slightly lower noise at high ISO
Battery life Much shorter battery life

Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro Competitors

Nikon D200

Nikon D200

Pro DSLR

$1,799 body only

$1,300 with 18-70mm lens

Color depth Better color depth
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Dynamic range Less dynamic range
Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500

Entry-level DSLR

$496 body only

$549 - $569 with 18-55mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Screen size Much larger screen
Viewfinder Doesn't have a pentaprism viewfinder
Nikon D300S

Nikon D300S

Pro DSLR

$1,286 body only

$1,899 with 18-200mm lens

Low light performance Much lower noise at high ISO
Screen size Much larger screen
Dynamic range Less dynamic range

discussion

Nikon D3
D3
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro
FinePix S5 Pro
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments