differences

Advantages of the Fujifilm S2800HD

Report a correction
Size
Smaller
110×73×81 mm vs 124×85×105 mm
Help
More than 40% smaller
Thickness
Thinner
3.2" vs 4.1"
Help
More than 20% thinner
Screen resolution
Slightly higher resolution screen
230k dots vs 201k dots
Help
More than 10% higher resolution screen
Weight
Lighter
437 g vs 540 g
Help
Around 20% lighter
Fujifilm FinePix S2800HD Learn more about
the Fujifilm S2800HD

Advantages of the Kodak Z981

Report a correction
Wide angle
Better wide angle
26 mm vs 28 mm
Help
Around 10% better wide angle
Aperture
Wider aperture
f/2.8 vs f/3.1
Help
At its widest zoom, the Z981's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Image stabilization
Better image stabilization
  1. Lens
vs
  1. Sensor shift
Help
Less risk of blur
Light sensitivity
Better maximum light sensitivity
3,200 ISO vs 1,600 ISO
Help
The Z981's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Longest exposure
Longer exposures
16s vs 8s
Help
2x longer exposures
Kodak EasyShare Z981 Learn more about
the Kodak Z981
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent super zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Fujifilm FinePix S2800HD Fujifilm FinePix S2800HD 62
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save
        vs
        67 Kodak EasyShare Z981 Kodak EasyShare Z981
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths
              Viewfinder Both have digital viewfinders Help
              Digital
              Common Weaknesses
              Fastest shutter speed Slow max shutter speed Help
              1/2000 of a second
              Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
              CCD
              Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
              S2800HD230k dots
              Z981201k dots
              Continuous shooting Slow continuous shooting Help
              S2800HD1.2 fps
              Z9810.9 fps
              Thickness Quite thick Help
              S2800HD3.2"
              Z9814.1"
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible
              Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
              S2800HD1,600 ISO
              Z9813,200 ISO
              Touch screen No touchscreens Help
              More buttons
              Sensor size Very small sensors Help
              S2800HD1/2.3" 6.16x4.62mm
              Z9811/2.3" 6.13x4.6mm
              True resolution Capture low resolution images Help
              9.8 MP

              Compared to recent super zooms

              Common Strengths
              Size Fairly small Help
              S2800HD110×73×81 mm
              Z981124×85×105 mm
              Weight Light weight Help
              S2800HD437 g
              Z981540 g
              Thickness Thin Help
              S2800HD3.2"
              Z9814.1"
              Common Weaknesses
              External flash No external flash support Help
              Less expandable
              Longest exposure Short max exposure time Help
              S2800HD8s
              Z98116s
              External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
              Limited to the in-camera mic
              Autofocus Slower contrast detection autofocus Help
              slower focusing
              Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
              S2800HD28 mm
              Z98126 mm
              Zoom Poor zoom Help
              S2800HD18x
              Z98126x

              appearance

              Kodak EasyShare Z981 Fujifilm FinePix S2800HD
              Kodak EasyShare Z981 Fujifilm FinePix S2800HD
              Kodak EasyShare Z981 Fujifilm FinePix S2800HD

              discussion

              Fujifilm FinePix S2800HD
              FinePix S2800HD
              Fujifilm

              Report a correction
              Kodak EasyShare Z981
              EasyShare Z981
              Kodak

              Report a correction

              Showing 0 comments