Updated (February 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS10 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V vs Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

53

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS10

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,000 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS10.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V Competitors

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$482 - $483

Zoom More zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
GPS No built-in GPS
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Super zoom

$398

Zoom More zoom
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

Super zoom

$328

Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Slightly smaller
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

Fujifilm FinePix HS10 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S4800

Fujifilm FinePix S4800

Super zoom

$1,091

Size Smaller
Lowest price Much cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon D5000

Nikon D5000

Entry-level DSLR

$544 body only

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$499

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Lowest price Significantly cheaper
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix HS10
FinePix HS10
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments