Updated (April 2011): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS10 vs Nikon D5100

Fujifilm FinePix HS10 vs Nikon D5100

Tie
Fujifilm FinePix HS10

57

Nikon D5100

55

Tie

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS10

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
1,000 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D5100

Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
500 ms startup delay
Dynamic range
Wide dynamic range
13.6 EV
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS10.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D5100.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS10 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Super zoom

$700

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Samsung WB2200F

Samsung WB2200F

Super zoom

$415

Zoom Much more zoom
HDR Has in-camera HDR
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Super zoom

$820

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

Nikon D5100 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$426 body only

$390 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Overall image quality Slightly better image quality
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$389 body only

$390 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Higher true resolution
Color depth Better color depth
HDR Lacks in-camera HDR
Nikon D5300

Nikon D5300

Entry-level DSLR

$390 - $597 body only

$469 - $697 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix HS10
FinePix HS10
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon D5100
D5100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments