Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

62

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

57

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.
Explore our gallery of 31 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Panasonic Lumix TS5

Waterproof

$190

Screen size Much larger screen
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$138 - $168

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Significantly smaller
Aperture Narrower aperture
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS4

Panasonic Lumix TS4

Waterproof

$400

Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Size Slightly smaller
Lowest price More expensive

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4

Waterproof

$299 - $329

Aperture Much wider aperture
Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly larger
Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80

Waterproof

$129 - $149

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger
Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$109 - $147

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Wide angle Worse wide angle

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3
Lumix DMC-TS3
Panasonic

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments