Updated (February 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 vs Olympus TG-620

Olympus TG-620 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Olympus TG-620

71

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

66

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus TG-620

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Compact (98×66×22 mm)
Thin
Thickness
0.9"
Light-weight
Weight
167 g
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Size
Really small
Compact (99×68×26 mm)
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
Thickness
Thin
1"
Weight
Light-weight
175 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.

competitors

Olympus TG-620 Competitors

Olympus TG-310

Olympus TG310

Waterproof

$166

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Olympus TG-820 iHS

Olympus TG-820

Waterproof

$260

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Weight Slightly lighter
Thickness Slightly thicker
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS3

Waterproof

$587

Aperture Wider aperture
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Screen size Significantly smaller screen

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Fujifilm XP90

Fujifilm XP90

Waterproof

$134 - $179

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Larger
Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32

Waterproof

$169

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Much larger
Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Waterproof

$170

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Olympus TG-620
TG-620
Olympus

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments