Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

84

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

78

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4

Waterproof

$379 - $400

Aperture Much wider aperture
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20

Waterproof

$399

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix AW110

Nikon Coolpix AW110

Waterproof

$277

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Larger

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix TS25

Panasonic Lumix TS25

Waterproof

$149

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Smaller
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Boutique

$700

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Aperture Much wider aperture
Size Much larger
Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Fujifilm FinePix XP150

Waterproof

GPS Has a GPS
Battery life Significantly longer battery life
Size Larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Stef (1:22 AM, January 01, 2013)
Considering there is over a $100 price difference the outcome here isn't surprising. You're not really comparing apples to apples!