Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

63

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

59

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Weight
Light-weight
175 g
Size
Really small
Compact (99×68×26 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$99 - $147

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$345 - $347

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix AW110

Nikon Coolpix AW110

Waterproof

$277

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Larger

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$429 - $649 body only

$520 - $649 with 18-55mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Much larger
Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Waterproof

$260

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Olympus TG-310

Olympus TG310

Waterproof

$399

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Smaller
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Stef (1:22 AM, January 01, 2013)
Considering there is over a $100 price difference the outcome here isn't surprising. You're not really comparing apples to apples!