Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

71

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

66

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

We are not aware of any reasons to consider buying the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 over the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S33

Nikon Coolpix S33

Waterproof

$107 - $175

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$249 - $347

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Panasonic Lumix DMC-TS30

Waterproof

$138 - $140

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Fujifilm FinePix XP60

Waterproof

$164

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Battery life Shorter battery life
Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32

Waterproof

$144

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Much larger
Fujifilm FinePix XP20

Fujifilm FinePix XP20

Waterproof

$170

Size Smaller
Thickness Thinner
Movie format Lower resolution movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Stef (1:22 AM, January 01, 2013)
Considering there is over a $100 price difference the outcome here isn't surprising. You're not really comparing apples to apples!