Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

59

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

55

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Size
Really small
Compact (99×68×26 mm)
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$269 - $347

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen type Has an OLED screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix AW110

Nikon Coolpix AW110

Waterproof

$239

Screen type Has an OLED screen
3D Takes 3D photos
Size Larger
Nikon Coolpix AW120

Nikon Coolpix AW120

Waterproof

$266

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Screen type Has an OLED screen
Size Larger

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80

Waterproof

$140 - $149

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger
Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Fujifilm FinePix XP30

Waterproof

$294

GPS Has a GPS
Size Smaller
Movie format Lower resolution movies
Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Waterproof

$110

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Stef (1:22 AM, January 01, 2013)
Considering there is over a $100 price difference the outcome here isn't surprising. You're not really comparing apples to apples!