Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix XP50 vs Nikon Coolpix AW100

Nikon Coolpix AW100 vs Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Winner
Nikon Coolpix AW100

73

Fujifilm FinePix XP50

68

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix AW100

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Really small
Size
Compact (110×65×23 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix XP50

Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Size
Really small
Compact (99×68×26 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Thickness
Thin
1"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix XP50.
Explore our gallery of 21 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix AW100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix AW100 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Fujifilm FinePix XP70

Waterproof

$172

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

GoPro Hero 3+ Silver Edition

Waterproof

$472

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Olympus Tough TG-4

Olympus Tough TG-4

Waterproof

$380

Aperture Much wider aperture
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Fujifilm FinePix XP50 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S32

Nikon Coolpix S32

Waterproof

$180

Aperture Wider aperture
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Size Much larger
Pentax Optio W60

Pentax Optio W60

Waterproof

$300

Aperture Wider aperture
Size Smaller
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Fujifilm XP80

Fujifilm XP80

Waterproof

$167

Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Size Slightly larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix AW100
Coolpix AW100
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix XP50
FinePix XP50
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

Stef (1:22 AM, January 01, 2013)
Considering there is over a $100 price difference the outcome here isn't surprising. You're not really comparing apples to apples!