Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 vs Fujifilm Finepix X10

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

51

Fujifilm Finepix X10

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7

Wide aperture
Aperture
f/1.4
Takes 3D photos
3D
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm Finepix X10

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
200 fps
Focus points
Many focus points
49
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm Finepix X10.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100

Boutique

$599 - $698

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Low light performance Significantly lower noise at high ISO
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$398

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Startup delay Much less startup delay
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$298

Zoom More zoom
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Much narrower aperture

Fujifilm Finepix X10 Competitors

Fujifilm X30

Fujifilm X30

Pro digicam

$400 - $499

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Pro digicam

$579

Autofocus Faster autofocus
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70

Boutique

$700

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7
Lumix DMC-LX7
Panasonic

Report a correction
Fujifilm Finepix X10
Finepix X10
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments