Updated (August 2012): Compare the Fujifilm Finepix X10 vs Nikon Coolpix P7700

Nikon Coolpix P7700 vs Fujifilm Finepix X10

Tie
Nikon Coolpix P7700

48

Fujifilm Finepix X10

48

Tie

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P7700

Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
120 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm Finepix X10

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
200 fps
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Tunnel
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm Finepix X10.
Explore our gallery of 13 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P7700.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7700 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Pro digicam

$480

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Lowest price More expensive
Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$499 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G1X

Canon PowerShot G1X

Boutique

$415

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Fujifilm Finepix X10 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Fujifilm FinePix x20

Pro digicam

$514

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm X30

Fujifilm X30

Pro digicam

$435

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Boutique

$650

Sensor size Much larger sensor
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P7700
Coolpix P7700
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm Finepix X10
Finepix X10
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments