Sony Alpha a6500 vs Fujifilm X-T2

Sony Alpha a6500
Fujifilm X-T2

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha a6500

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-T2

Viewfinder size
Large viewfinder
0.76x
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

competitors

Sony Alpha a6500 Competitors

Placeholder

Sony a6400

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$898 - $900 body only

$998 with 16-50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Longer battery life
Thickness Thicker
Placeholder

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 VI

Travel zoom

$1,198

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$673 - $748 body only

$784 - $848 with 16-50mm lens

Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Touch screen No touch screen

Fujifilm X-T2 Competitors

Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,399 body only

$1,699 with 18-55mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T30

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$899 body only

$999 with 15-45mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly faster
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 - $749 body only

$760 - $799 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
GPS Has a GPS
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder

discussion

Sony Alpha a6500
Alpha a6500
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-T2
X-T2
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments