Olympus OM-D E-M10 III vs Fujifilm X-T100

Placeholder
Placeholder

Reasons to buy the Olympus OM-D E-M10 III

Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
108 lenses
Long exposures
Longest exposure
60 seconds
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-T100

External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

competitors

Olympus OM-D E-M10 III Competitors

Placeholder

Nikon Z 6

Boutique

$1,997 - $2,594

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Much larger screen
Interchangeable lenses Built-in lens only
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$695 - $798 body only

$794 - $898 with 16-50mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Touch screen No touch screen
Placeholder

Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,149 - $2,298 body only

$2,549 with 45-200mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
True resolution Lower true resolution

Fujifilm X-T100 Competitors

Placeholder

Sony Alpha a7 III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,898 - $1,998 body only

$2,098 - $2,230 with 28-70mm lens

Focus points Many more focus points
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Placeholder

Fujifilm X-A5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$549 with 15-45mm lens

Size Smaller
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$695 - $798 body only

$794 - $898 with 16-50mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Focus points Significantly more focus points
Touch screen No touch screen

discussion

Placeholder
OM-D E-M10 III
Olympus

Report a correction
Placeholder
X-T100
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments