Sony Alpha A6000 vs Fujifilm X-T10

Sony Alpha A6000
Fujifilm X-T10

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
High true resolution
True resolution
24 MP
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-T10

Light sensitivity
High ISO
51,000 ISO
Badge
Phase detection autofocus
fast and accurate
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
Thickness
Thin
1.6"

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$794 - $798 body only

$898 with 16-50mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder size Significantly smaller viewfinder
Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$398 body only

$498 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Alpha a6500

Sony Alpha a6500

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,298 body only

$1,398 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization

Fujifilm X-T10 Competitors

Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$899 body only

$899 - $999 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Fujifilm X-E2

Fujifilm X-E2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$660 body only

$500 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$599 - $1,299 body only

$899 - $1,699 with 18-55mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-T10
X-T10
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments