Leica M Typ 240 vs Fujifilm X-T1

Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm X-T1

Reasons to buy the Leica M Typ 240

Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.68x
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
13.3 EV
High true resolution
True resolution
23.7 MP
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
750 ms startup delay
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-T1

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Weight
Light-weight
440 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-T1.

competitors

Leica M Typ 240 Competitors

Leica M10

Leica M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$6,895 - $7,249 body only

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
GPS Has a GPS
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Leica M (Typ 262)

Leica M (Typ 262)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$5,595 body only

$5,995 with 50mm lens

GPS Has a GPS
Lowest price Cheaper
Live view No live view
Leica Q (Typ 116)

Leica Q (Typ 116)

Boutique

$4,250

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Supports 24p No 24p support

Fujifilm X-T1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm X-T2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,533 - $1,599 body only

$1,847 - $1,899 with 18-55mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
True resolution Significantly higher true resolution
Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$899 body only

$999 with 16-50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 - $498 body only

$579 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Weather sealed No weather sealing

discussion

Leica M Typ 240
M Typ 240
Leica

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-T1
X-T1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments