Fujifilm X-T10 vs Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T10
Fujifilm X-T1

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-T10

24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
Phase detection autofocus
Badge
fast and accurate
Really small
Size
Mid size (118×83×41 mm)
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-T1

Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-T1.

competitors

Fujifilm X-T10 Competitors

Placeholder

Fujifilm X-T100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 - $500 body only

$550 - $600 with 15-45mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
GPS No built-in GPS
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 - $749 body only

$630 - $799 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$448 body only

$498 with 14-42mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Autofocus Slower autofocus

Fujifilm X-T1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 - $749 body only

$630 - $799 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Weather sealed No weather sealing
Placeholder

Canon EOS M100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$399 with 15-45mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Nikon D3400

Nikon D3400

Entry-level DSLR

$320 body only

$394 - $497 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage

discussion

Fujifilm X-T10
X-T10
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-T1
X-T1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments