Fujifilm X-S1 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Winner
Fujifilm X-S1

53

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-S1

Large sensor
Sensor size
2/3" 8.8x6.6mm
Great battery life
Battery life
460 shots
Many focus points
Focus points
49
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (124×82×92 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
Thickness
Thin
3.6"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-S1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150.

competitors

Fujifilm X-S1 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$531

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Fujifilm FinePix S1

Fujifilm FinePix S1

Super zoom

$500

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$472 - $598

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Sensor size Smaller sensor

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$472 - $598

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$298 - $311

HDR Has in-camera HDR
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ70

Super zoom

$240 - $298

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Fujifilm X-S1
X-S1
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
Lumix DMC-FZ150
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments