Fujifilm X-S1 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Winner
Fujifilm X-S1

57

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

50

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-S1

Great image quality
Overall image quality
49.0
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
11.2 EV
Fast shutter speed
Fastest shutter speed
1/4000 of a second
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (124×82×92 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Thickness
Thin
3.6"
Weight
Light-weight
528 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-S1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150.

competitors

Fujifilm X-S1 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$500

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom More zoom
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Fujifilm FinePix S1

Fujifilm FinePix S1

Super zoom

$626

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$425

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$499 - $598

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Fujifilm X-S1
X-S1
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
Lumix DMC-FZ150
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments