Fujifilm X-S1 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Winner
Fujifilm X-S1

57

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

50

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-S1

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (124×82×92 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
220 fps
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-S1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150.

competitors

Fujifilm X-S1 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$500

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom More zoom
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Nikon Coolpix P7800

Nikon Coolpix P7800

Pro digicam

$900

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Size Much smaller
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Canon EOS Rebel T6

Canon EOS Rebel T6

Entry-level DSLR

$318 - $649 body only

$367 - $449 with 18-55mm lens

Size Much smaller
Supports 24p Supports 24p
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300

Super zoom

$493 - $598

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$390

Battery life Significantly longer battery life
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Size Larger

discussion

Fujifilm X-S1
X-S1
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150
Lumix DMC-FZ150
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments