Fujifilm X-S1 vs Nikon Coolpix P100

Winner
Fujifilm X-S1

55

Nikon Coolpix P100

44

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-S1

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P100

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (114×83×99 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Weight
Light-weight
481 g
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-S1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P100.

competitors

Fujifilm X-S1 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S1

Fujifilm FinePix S1

Super zoom

$500

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$568

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

Super zoom

$309 - $317

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
3D Takes 3D photos
Overall image quality Much worse image quality

Nikon Coolpix P100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500

Super zoom

$450

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III

Super zoom

$1,498

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$199

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

discussion

Fujifilm X-S1
X-S1
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix P100
Coolpix P100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments