Fujifilm X-T3 vs Fujifilm X-Pro2

Placeholder
Fujifilm X-Pro2

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-T3

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
20 fps
Great viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder coverage
100%
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro2

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,620k dots
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (141×83×56 mm)
Thickness
Thin
2.2"
Weight
Light-weight
495 g

competitors

Fujifilm X-T3 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon EOS R

Boutique

$2,199 - $2,299

Focus points Many more focus points
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Placeholder

Sony a7R III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,798 - $2,898 body only

$3,483 - $3,696 with 24-70mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Placeholder

Fujifilm X-H1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,522 - $1,649 body only

$2,648 with 16-55mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Continuous shooting Shoots significantly slower

Fujifilm X-Pro2 Competitors

Placeholder

Sony a7R III

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$2,798 - $2,898 body only

$3,483 - $3,696 with 24-70mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder coverage Much better viewfinder coverage
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-T2

Fujifilm X-T2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$939 - $1,099 body only

$1,349 - $1,499 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder coverage Much better viewfinder coverage
Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-T20

Fujifilm X-T20

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$699 - $749 body only

$630 - $799 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Viewfinder coverage Much better viewfinder coverage
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen

discussion

Placeholder
X-T3
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro2
X-Pro2
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments