Sony Alpha A6000 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Sony Alpha A6000
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Sony Alpha A6000

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
0.70x
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,230k dots
Thickness
Thin
1.7"
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.

competitors

Sony Alpha A6000 Competitors

Sony Alpha A5100

Sony Alpha A5100

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$363 - $448 body only

$450 - $548 with 16-50mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Placeholder

Canon EOS M50 (EOS Kiss M)

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Lens availability Significantly fewer lenses available
Sony Alpha a6300

Sony Alpha a6300

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,030 body only

$848 with 18-55mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Battery life Slightly longer battery life
Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,699 body only

$1,964 - $2,299 with 23mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Weather sealed Weather sealed
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,299 body only

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Viewfinder size Significantly larger viewfinder
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Sony Alpha A6000
Alpha A6000
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments