Pentax K-5 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Pentax K-5
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Pentax K-5

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
600 ms startup delay
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,230k dots
Size
Really small
Standard size (140×82×43 mm)
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Thickness
Thin
1.7"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Explore our gallery of 4 sample photos taken by the Pentax K-5.

competitors

Pentax K-5 Competitors

Pentax K-3

Pentax K-3

Entry-level DSLR

$799 body only

$900 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Overall image quality Slightly worse image quality
Pentax KP

Pentax KP

Entry-level DSLR

$1,088 - $1,097 body only

$1,600 with 18-135mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Pentax K-50

Pentax K-50

Entry-level DSLR

$350 body only

$418 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Weight Lighter
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,699 body only

$2,299 - $2,300 with 23mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$799 - $999 body only

$1,199 with 18-55mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$525 - $599 body only

$699 - $767 with 16-50mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

discussion

Pentax K-5
K-5
Pentax

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments