Pentax K-5 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Pentax K-5
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Pentax K-5

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
600 ms startup delay
Barely any delay taking photos
Shutter lag
104 ms shutter lag
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Thickness
Thin
1.7"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Explore our gallery of 4 sample photos taken by the Pentax K-5.

competitors

Pentax K-5 Competitors

Pentax K-3

Pentax K-3

Entry-level DSLR

$953 body only

$867 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Overall image quality Slightly worse image quality
Pentax KP

Pentax KP

Entry-level DSLR

$999 - $1,000 body only

Touch screen Has a touch screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Autofocus Slower autofocus
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$450 - $498 body only

$579 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Built-in focus motor Doesn't have a built-in focus motor

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,637 - $1,699 body only

$2,299 - $2,598 with 23mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$802 - $1,299 body only

$1,025 - $1,699 with 18-55mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm X-E2

Fujifilm X-E2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 body only

$1,043 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Pentax K-5
K-5
Pentax

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments