Pentax K-5 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Pentax K-5
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Pentax K-5

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Almost no delay when powering up
Startup delay
600 ms startup delay
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thickness
Thin
1.7"
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Explore our gallery of 4 sample photos taken by the Pentax K-5.

competitors

Pentax K-5 Competitors

Pentax K-3

Pentax K-3

Entry-level DSLR

$659 - $695 body only

$989 with 18-135mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Screen size Larger screen
Startup delay More startup delay
Pentax K-50

Pentax K-50

Entry-level DSLR

$280 - $295 body only

$377 - $470 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Supports 24p Supports 24p
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Pentax K-1

Pentax K-1

Pro DSLR

$1,797 body only

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Screen size Larger screen
Size Larger

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,699 body only

$2,100 with 35mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$585 - $799 body only

$744 - $899 with 16-50mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$825 - $1,299 body only

$1,399 - $1,899 with 18-135mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Pentax K-5
K-5
Pentax

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments