Nikon D90 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Nikon D90
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Nikon D90

Built-in focus motor
Badge
Autofocuses with more lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,230k dots
Size
Really small
Standard size (140×82×43 mm)
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
Panorama
In-camera panoramas
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Explore our gallery of 47 sample photos taken by the Nikon D90.

competitors

Nikon D90 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$419 body only

$419 - $447 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Overall image quality Better image quality
Built-in focus motor Doesn't have a built-in focus motor
Nikon D7000

Nikon D7000

Entry-level DSLR

$549 body only

$1,220 with 18-105mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Viewfinder coverage Much better viewfinder coverage
Startup delay Slightly more startup delay
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$389 body only

$399 - $699 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Video autofocus
Overall image quality Better image quality
Built-in focus motor Doesn't have a built-in focus motor

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,400 - $1,699 body only

$1,900 - $2,299 with 23mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$546 - $799 body only

$800 - $899 with 16-50mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-T1

Fujifilm X-T1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$832 - $1,299 body only

$1,399 - $1,899 with 18-135mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Nikon D90
D90
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments