Nikon DF vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Nikon DF
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Nikon DF

Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
Low noise at high ISO
Low light performance
3,279 ISO
Slightly more lenses available
Lens availability
171 lenses
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Size
Really small
Standard size (140×82×43 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.7"
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon DF.

competitors

Nikon DF Competitors

Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,399 - $1,797 body only

$1,965 - $2,297 with 24-120mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Low light performance Significantly more noise at high ISO
Nikon D800

Nikon D800

Pro DSLR

$2,899 body only

Overall image quality Much better image quality
True resolution Much higher true resolution
Size Larger
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$1,397 - $1,497 body only

$1,725 - $2,447 with 28-300mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Movie format Shoots movies
Low light performance Significantly more noise at high ISO

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,499 body only

$2,099 - $2,598 with 23mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$538 - $799 body only

$769 with 16-50mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-E2

Fujifilm X-E2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$655 body only

$1,043 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports 24p No 24p support

discussion

Nikon DF
DF
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments