Nikon D800 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Nikon D800
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Nikon D800

High true resolution
True resolution
36.2 MP
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Built-in focus motor
Badge
Autofocuses with more lenses
More storage slots
Storage slots
2
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Size
Really small
Standard size (140×82×43 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.7"
Weight
Light-weight
450 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon D800.

competitors

Nikon D800 Competitors

Nikon D750

Nikon D750

Pro DSLR

$1,530 - $1,797 body only

$2,221 - $2,297 with 24-120mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
True resolution Significantly lower true resolution
Nikon D810

Nikon D810

Pro DSLR

$2,239 - $2,797 body only

$2,900 - $3,297 with 24-120mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$1,220 - $1,497 body only

$1,667 - $1,997 with 24-85mm lens

Size Smaller
Weight Lighter
True resolution Significantly lower true resolution

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,650 - $1,699 body only

$2,299 with 23mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 - $498 body only

$579 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$525 - $599 body only

$689 - $699 with 16-50mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

discussion

Nikon D800
D800
Nikon

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments