Fujifilm FinePix X100 vs Fujifilm X-Pro1

Fujifilm FinePix X100
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix X100

Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-Pro1

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 24fps
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
1,230k dots
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-Pro1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix X100.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix X100 Competitors

Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $498 body only

$479 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 V

Pro digicam

$998 - $1,010

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Leica M9

Leica M9

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
True resolution Higher true resolution
Screen size Smaller screen

Fujifilm X-Pro1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,030 body only

$848 with 18-55mm lens

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Slightly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,699 body only

$1,964 - $2,299 with 23mm lens

Weather sealed Weather sealed
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Viewfinder coverage Much less viewfinder coverage
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $498 body only

$479 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix X100
FinePix X100
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-Pro1
X-Pro1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments