Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 vs Fujifilm X-M1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Fujifilm X-M1

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Great battery life
Battery life
540 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-M1

Size
Really small
Mid size (117×67×39 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.5"
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-M1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 Competitors

Placeholder

Canon PowerShot SX730 HS

Travel zoom

$319 - $379

Size Significantly smaller
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX350

Travel zoom

$268 - $345

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Much thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ80 (Lumix DC-FZ82)

Super zoom

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Screen does not flip out

Fujifilm X-M1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,030 body only

$848 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Screen size Smaller screen
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$522 body only

$400 with 16-50mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
GPS Has a GPS
Size Slightly larger
Sony NEX-7

Sony NEX 7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$737 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Lowest price Slightly more expensive

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Lumix DMC-FZ200
Panasonic

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-M1
X-M1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments