Fujifilm X-E2 vs Fujifilm X-M1

Fujifilm X-E2
Fujifilm X-M1

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-E2

Large viewfinder
Viewfinder size
1.64x
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-M1

Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-E2.
Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-M1.

competitors

Fujifilm X-E2 Competitors

Fujifilm X-Pro1

Fujifilm X-Pro1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$898 body only

$1,662 with 27mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder
Fujifilm X-E2S

Fujifilm X-E2S

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 body only

$799 - $899 with 18-55mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Autofocus Faster autofocus
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Nikon D5500

Nikon D5500

Entry-level DSLR

$496 body only

$549 - $569 with 18-55mm lens

Battery life Much longer battery life
Screen size Much larger screen
Viewfinder size Much smaller viewfinder

Fujifilm X-M1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-E1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$580 body only

$849 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Fujifilm X-A3

Fujifilm X-A3

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$443 body only

$549 with 16-50mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Olympus PEN E-PM2

Olympus PEN E-PM2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$380 with 14-42mm lens

Shutter lag Much less shutter lag
Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Fujifilm X-E2
X-E2
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-M1
X-M1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments