Pentax K-3 II vs Fujifilm X-E1

Pentax K-3 II
Fujifilm X-E1

Reasons to buy the Pentax K-3 II

Full HD
Movie format
1080p @ 60fps
Large screen
Screen size
3.2"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Weather sealed
Weather sealed
Shoot in extreme weather
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-E1

Size
Really small
Mid size (129×75×38 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.5"
Weight
Light-weight
350 g
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
External flash not needed

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-E1.

competitors

Pentax K-3 II Competitors

Pentax KP

Pentax KP

Entry-level DSLR

$797 body only

$914 with 50mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Pentax K-70

Pentax K-70

Entry-level DSLR

$595 body only

$672 - $715 with 18-55mm lens

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Nikon D500

Nikon D500

Pro DSLR

$1,399 - $1,797 body only

$2,114 - $2,397 with 16-80mm lens

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Size Larger

Fujifilm X-E1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E2

Fujifilm X-E2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$555 body only

$668 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm X-Pro1

Fujifilm X-Pro1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,045 body only

$1,641 with 35mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen size Larger screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$379 - $498 body only

$479 - $598 with 16-50mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Thickness Slightly thicker

discussion

Pentax K-3 II
K-3 II
Pentax

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-E1
X-E1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments