Fujifilm X-A1 vs Fujifilm X-E1

Fujifilm X-A1
Fujifilm X-E1

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-A1

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-E1

Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Supports 24p
24p movies
For that film look
Viewfinder coverage
Great viewfinder coverage
100%
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 6 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-A1.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-E1.

competitors

Fujifilm X-A1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-M1

Fujifilm X-M1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$779 body only

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony Alpha A6000

Sony Alpha A6000

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$548 body only

$626 - $648 with 16-50mm lens

Viewfinder Has a viewfinder
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Slightly larger
Fujifilm X-A2

Fujifilm X-A2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$492 body only

$495 with 16-50mm lens

Battery life Longer battery life
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Weight Slightly heavier

Fujifilm X-E1 Competitors

Fujifilm X-E2

Fujifilm X-E2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$420 body only

$1,099 with 18-55mm lens

Viewfinder size Much larger viewfinder
Screen size Much larger screen
Supports 24p No 24p support
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$526 - $799 body only

$699 - $899 with 16-50mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Fujifilm X-M1

Fujifilm X-M1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$779 body only

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Viewfinder No viewfinder

discussion

Fujifilm X-A1
X-A1
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Fujifilm X-E1
X-E1
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments