Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S4200 vs Olympus SZ-30MR

Olympus SZ-30MR vs Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Winner
Olympus SZ-30MR

53

Fujifilm FinePix S4200

50

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Olympus SZ-30MR

Really small
Size
Mid size (106×69×40 mm)
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Thin
Thickness
1.6"
Light-weight
Weight
246 g
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
Screen size
Large screen
3"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S4200.

competitors

Olympus SZ-30MR Competitors

Olympus SZ-31MR iHS

Olympus SZ-31MR

Travel zoom

$3,000

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Lowest price Much more expensive
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ40

Super zoom

$871

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Aperture Slightly wider aperture
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$499 - $549 body only

$360 - $549 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

Fujifilm FinePix S4200 Competitors

Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

Super zoom

$340

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Viewfinder No viewfinder
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$358 body only

$438 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Zoom

Fujifilm FinePix S9000 Zoom

Pro digicam

Aperture Wider aperture
Storage slots Has more storage slots
Screen size Much smaller screen

discussion

Olympus SZ-30MR
SZ-30MR
Olympus

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix S4200
FinePix S4200
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments