Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX vs Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Winner
Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

48

Fujifilm FinePix S2950

40

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
Shoots RAW
Supports RAW
Better editing
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S2950

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (110×73×81 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/2000 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S2950.
Explore our gallery of 44 sample photos taken by the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX.

competitors

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$509 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Much larger
Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Super zoom

$105 - $159

Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Smaller
Macro focus Much worse macro capability
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$299 body only

$349 - $397 with 18-55mm lens

True resolution Much higher true resolution
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Fujifilm FinePix S2950 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S1800

Fujifilm FinePix S1800

Super zoom

Weight Lighter
Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
Canon Rebel T5i

Canon Rebel T5i

Entry-level DSLR

$404 - $649 body only

$520 - $599 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Coolpix L330

Nikon Coolpix L330

Super zoom

$109

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
Easyshare Z990 MAX
Kodak

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix S2950
FinePix S2950
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments