Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v vs Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

49

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Really small
Size
Prosumer size (122×87×93 mm)
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
320 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Super zoom

$429 - $448

Zoom Significantly more zoom
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V

Travel zoom

$419 - $428

Size Significantly smaller
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Super zoom

$1,062

Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity (boost) Has boost ISO
Lowest price Significantly more expensive

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$525

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Super zoom

$700

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Slightly smaller
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Super zoom

$360

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v
Cybershot DSC-HX100v
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
FinePix HS30 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments