Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v vs Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

63

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

60

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

Really small
Size
Prosumer size (122×87×93 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
320 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V

Super zoom

$300 - $428

Zoom Significantly more zoom
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Size Larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Super zoom

$531

Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity (boost) Has boost ISO
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 (Lumix DMC-TZ100)

Travel zoom

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Movie format Lower resolution movies

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$525

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack
Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$435

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Size Larger
Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS35EXR

Super zoom

$400

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v
Cybershot DSC-HX100v
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
FinePix HS30 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments