Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v vs Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Winner
Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

49

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Really small
Size
Prosumer size (122×87×93 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
320 fps
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
Battery life
Great battery life
600 shots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v.

competitors

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V

Super zoom

$700

Wide angle Better wide angle
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-HX300

Super zoom

$491

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Canon EOS Rebel T6i

Entry-level DSLR

$799 - $852 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Supports 24p Supports 24p
GPS No built-in GPS

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$369 - $447

Zoom Much more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$499

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Battery life Much shorter battery life
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Super zoom

$700

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Size Slightly smaller
Battery life Much shorter battery life

discussion

Sony Cybershot DSC-HX100v
Cybershot DSC-HX100v
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR
FinePix HS30 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments