Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR vs Nikon D3100

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

51

Nikon D3100

37

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
320 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
11 fps
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon D3100

Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Live view
Has live view
Preview your photos
Badge
Autofocuses shooting video
Contrast detection

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR.
Explore our gallery of 48 sample photos taken by the Nikon D3100.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Super zoom

$500

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Supports RAW Shoots RAW
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

Super zoom

$430

Supports RAW Shoots RAW
Size Slightly smaller
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$452 body only

$399 - $547 with 18-55mm lens

Size Significantly smaller
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon D3100 Competitors

Nikon D3300

Nikon D3300

Entry-level DSLR

$452 body only

$399 - $547 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$268 body only

$330 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
True resolution Higher true resolution
Overall image quality Worse image quality
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$299 body only

$349 with 18-55mm lens

Overall image quality Significantly better image quality
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR
FinePix HS25 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon D3100
D3100
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments