Updated (February 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR vs Nikon Coolpix L810

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR vs Nikon Coolpix L810

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

49

Nikon Coolpix L810

43

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
320 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L810

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (111×76×83 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L810.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Super zoom

$500

3D Takes 3D photos
External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$525

3D Takes 3D photos
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Supports RAW No RAW support
Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Super zoom

$799

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Continuous shooting Shoots slightly faster
Screen resolution Lower resolution screen

Nikon Coolpix L810 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$205

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Battery life Much longer battery life
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$179

Battery life Much longer battery life
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger
Nikon Coolpix L820

Nikon Coolpix L820

Super zoom

$180

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Weight Slightly heavier

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
FinePix HS20 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L810
Coolpix L810
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments