Updated (January 2012): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR vs Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

100

Fujifilm FinePix S4200

81

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
320 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S4200

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (118×81×100 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S4200.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS25 EXR

Super zoom

$469

Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Lowest price Cheaper
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Fujifilm X-S1

Fujifilm X-S1

Pro digicam

$830

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR

Super zoom

External mic jack Has an external mic jack
Battery life Much longer battery life
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity

Fujifilm FinePix S4200 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Fujifilm FinePix HS10

Super zoom

$900

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Size Larger
Fujifilm FinePix SL300

Fujifilm FinePix SL300

Super zoom

$298

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Zoom Slightly more zoom
Size Slightly larger
Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500

Super zoom

$599

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix HS20 EXR
FinePix HS20 EXR
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix S4200
FinePix S4200
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments