Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 vs Fujifilm FinePix X100s

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

76

Fujifilm FinePix X100s

56

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
24p movies
Supports 24p
For that film look
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix X100s

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2
Size
Really small
Standard size (127×74×54 mm)
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1900 ms startup delay
Sensor size
Large sensor
APS-C 23.6x15.8mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix X100s.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Super zoom

$1,163 - $1,298

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots faster
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Pro digicam

$527 - $698

Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Size Significantly larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Pro digicam

$748

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Size Significantly smaller
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Fujifilm FinePix X100s Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Boutique

$977 - $1,299

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70

Boutique

$699 - $700

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Fujifilm FinePix X100

Fujifilm FinePix X100

Boutique

$667

HDR Has in-camera HDR
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Startup delay Much more startup delay

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix X100s
FinePix X100s
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments