Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 vs Fujifilm FinePix X100s

Winner
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

68

Fujifilm FinePix X100s

47

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
High resolution screen
Screen resolution
1,229k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Flip-out screen
Screen flips out
Great for movies
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix X100s

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
1900 ms startup delay
Thickness
Thin
2.1"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix X100s.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10.

competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 Competitors

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II

Super zoom

$1,398 - $1,496

Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Lowest price More expensive
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000

Pro digicam

$698

Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Size Larger
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX100 III

Pro digicam

$698

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
External mic jack Lacks an external mic jack

Fujifilm FinePix X100s Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Boutique

$1,007 - $1,299

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Fujifilm X100F

Fujifilm X100F

Boutique

$1,299

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Lowest price More expensive
Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70

Boutique

$458 - $699

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Cyber-shot DSC-RX10
Sony

Report a correction
Fujifilm FinePix X100s
FinePix X100s
Fujifilm

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments