Fujifilm FinePix X100s vs Olympus Pen E-P5

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix X100s

52

Olympus Pen E-P5

48

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix X100s

CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus Pen E-P5

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
900 ms startup delay
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix X100s.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Olympus Pen E-P5.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix X100s Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Boutique

$1,069 - $1,099

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70

Boutique

$400 - $699

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Fujifilm X-T10

Fujifilm X-T10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$602 - $799 body only

$799 with 16-50mm lens

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen

Olympus Pen E-P5 Competitors

Olympus PEN E-PL7

Olympus PEN E-PL7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$349 - $399 body only

$323 with 14-42mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Olympus PEN-F

Olympus PEN-F

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$441 - $1,199 body only

$411 with 14-150mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Olympus OM-D E-M10

Olympus OM-D E-M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$400 - $649 body only

$400 - $699 with 14-42mm lens

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
HDR Has in-camera HDR
3D Doesn't take 3D photos

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix X100s
FinePix X100s
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Olympus Pen E-P5
Pen E-P5
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments