Fujifilm FinePix X100s vs Olympus Pen E-P5

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix X100s

56

Olympus Pen E-P5

51

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix X100s

CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
Built-in flash
Built-in flash
Usually standard
 

Reasons to buy the Olympus Pen E-P5

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Startup delay
Almost no delay when powering up
900 ms startup delay
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix X100s.
Explore our gallery of 23 sample photos taken by the Olympus Pen E-P5.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix X100s Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Fujifilm FinePix X100T

Boutique

$950 - $1,299

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen size Larger screen
Lowest price Slightly more expensive
Fujifilm X70

Fujifilm X70

Boutique

$644 - $699

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Touch screen Has a touch screen
Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
Fujifilm X-Pro2

Fujifilm X-Pro2

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,699 body only

$2,100 with 35mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Focus points Many more focus points
Size Larger

Olympus Pen E-P5 Competitors

Olympus PEN E-PL7

Olympus PEN E-PL7

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$399 body only

$449 with 14-42mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
HDR Has in-camera HDR
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Olympus PEN-F

Olympus PEN-F

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$1,199 body only

$1,534 with 17mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Built-in flash No built-in flash
Olympus PEN E-PL5

Olympus PEN E-PL5

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$299 body only

$397 with 14-42mm lens

Startup delay Less startup delay
Weight Lighter
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix X100s
FinePix X100s
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Olympus Pen E-P5
Pen E-P5
Olympus

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments