Updated (January 2013): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S8500 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Fujifilm FinePix S8500 vs Nikon Coolpix S9500

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8500

63

Nikon Coolpix S9500

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8500

Great zoom
Zoom
46x
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great battery life
Battery life
500 shots
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9500

Screen type
OLED Screen
Bright and vivid
Thickness
Thin
1.2"
GPS
Built-in GPS
Great for travel
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8500.
Explore our gallery of 40 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9500.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8500 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix S9200

Fujifilm FinePix S9200

Super zoom

$202

Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$140 - $178

Weight Lighter
Longest exposure Longer exposures
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix S9500 Competitors

Canon PowerShot S110

Canon PowerShot S110

Pro digicam

$440

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Screen type Doesn't have an OLED screen
Nikon Coolpix A900

Nikon Coolpix A900

Travel zoom

$215 - $397

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$260

Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Fastest shutter speed Much faster max shutter speed
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8500
FinePix S8500
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix S9500
Coolpix S9500
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments