Updated (January 2013): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S8300 vs Nikon Coolpix L820

Fujifilm FinePix S8300 vs Nikon Coolpix L820

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8300

51

Nikon Coolpix L820

45

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8300

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great battery life
Battery life
500 shots
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L820

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures

galleries

Explore our gallery of 4 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8300.
Explore our gallery of 30 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L820.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8300 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Super zoom

$160 - $179

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Significantly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$150 - $168

Weight Lighter
Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$176

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

Nikon Coolpix L820 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$229 - $235

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$176

Zoom More zoom
Wide angle Slightly better wide angle
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$172

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8300
FinePix S8300
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L820
Coolpix L820
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments