Fujifilm FinePix S8200 vs Nikon Coolpix L820

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8200

51

Nikon Coolpix L820

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8200

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L820

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8200.
Explore our gallery of 30 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L820.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$202 - $229

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Super zoom

$159

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Significantly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$199

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

Nikon Coolpix L820 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$202 - $229

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$199

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Wide angle Slightly better wide angle
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$257

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8200
FinePix S8200
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L820
Coolpix L820
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

penny marshalis (9:59 PM, June 20, 2013)
How were the scores tallied? Could more of an explanation concerning how evaluation was arrived at be given?