Fujifilm FinePix S8200 vs Nikon Coolpix L820

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8200

54

Nikon Coolpix L820

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8200

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L820

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
Size
Really small
Prosumer size (111×76×85 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8200.
Explore our gallery of 30 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L820.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Competitors

Nikon D3100

Nikon D3100

Entry-level DSLR

$503 with 18-55mm lens

Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530

Super zoom

$225

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Size Smaller
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Samsung WB800F

Samsung WB800F

Travel zoom

Size Significantly smaller
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix L820 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$369 - $447

Zoom Much more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$150 - $248

Zoom More zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$157 - $160

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Weight Slightly lighter
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8200
FinePix S8200
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L820
Coolpix L820
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

penny marshalis (9:59 PM, June 20, 2013)
How were the scores tallied? Could more of an explanation concerning how evaluation was arrived at be given?