Fujifilm FinePix S8200 vs Nikon Coolpix L820

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8200

54

Nikon Coolpix L820

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8200

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great battery life
Battery life
500 shots
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L820

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8200.
Explore our gallery of 30 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L820.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix B700

Nikon Coolpix B700

Super zoom

$394 - $447

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Movie format Higher resolution movies
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix S4000

Fujifilm FinePix S4000

Super zoom

$257

Size Smaller
Weight Lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon D40

Nikon D40

Entry-level DSLR

$899 body only

$690 with 18-55mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Interchangeable lenses Has interchangeable lenses
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Nikon Coolpix L820 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L810

Nikon Coolpix L810

Super zoom

$199

Weight Slightly lighter
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$229

Zoom More zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Light sensitivity Worse maximum light sensitivity
Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

Super zoom

$208

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Slightly smaller
Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8200
FinePix S8200
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L820
Coolpix L820
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

penny marshalis (9:59 PM, June 20, 2013)
How were the scores tallied? Could more of an explanation concerning how evaluation was arrived at be given?