Fujifilm FinePix S8200 vs Nikon Coolpix L820

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8200

54

Nikon Coolpix L820

49

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8200

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great battery life
Battery life
500 shots
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L820

Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8200.
Explore our gallery of 30 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L820.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Competitors

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$178 - $190

Weight Lighter
Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Super zoom

$229

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Significantly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Canon PowerShot SX410 IS

Super zoom

$160 - $179

Size Significantly smaller
Weight Significantly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Nikon Coolpix L820 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$216

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$229

Zoom More zoom
Wide angle Better wide angle
Size Slightly larger
Nikon Coolpix B500

Nikon Coolpix B500

Super zoom

$199 - $257

Zoom More zoom
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8200
FinePix S8200
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L820
Coolpix L820
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

penny marshalis (9:59 PM, June 20, 2013)
How were the scores tallied? Could more of an explanation concerning how evaluation was arrived at be given?