Fujifilm FinePix S8200 vs Nikon Coolpix L820

Winner
Fujifilm FinePix S8200

67

Nikon Coolpix L820

60

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8200

High speed movies
High-speed framerate
480 fps
High ISO
Light sensitivity
12,800 ISO
Great battery life
Battery life
500 shots
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L820

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Sensor type
CMOS Sensor
Better in low light
HDR
In-camera HDR
Combines multiple exposures
3D
Takes 3D photos
View photos in 3D on 3D televisions

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm FinePix S8200.
Explore our gallery of 30 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix L820.

competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$159 - $197

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Fujifilm FinePix S8600

Super zoom

$125 - $169

Size Significantly smaller
Thickness Significantly thinner
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Fujifilm FinePix S8350

Digicam

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Battery life Significantly shorter battery life

Nikon Coolpix L820 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix L840

Nikon Coolpix L840

Super zoom

$159 - $197

Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Zoom More zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix L830

Nikon Coolpix L830

Super zoom

$190

Zoom Slightly more zoom
Wide angle Slightly better wide angle
3D Doesn't take 3D photos
Nikon Coolpix L340

Nikon Coolpix L340

Super zoom

$185

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Weight Slightly lighter
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Fujifilm FinePix S8200
FinePix S8200
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Nikon Coolpix L820
Coolpix L820
Nikon

Report a correction

Showing 1 comments

penny marshalis (9:59 PM, June 20, 2013)
How were the scores tallied? Could more of an explanation concerning how evaluation was arrived at be given?