Updated (January, 2014): Compare the Fujifilm FinePix S8200 vs Nikon Coolpix L830

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix S8200

Zoom
Great zoom
40x
Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 60fps
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
480 fps
Light sensitivity
High ISO
12,800 ISO
 

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix L820

Movie format
Full HD
1080p @ 30fps
Screen resolution
High resolution screen
921k dots
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
240 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
8 fps
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Fujifilm S8200

Report a correction
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity 12,800 ISO vs 3,200 ISO
Help
The S8200's maximum light sensitivity is 2 f-stops better
Zoom More zoom 40x vs 29.3x
Help
Around 90% more zoom
High-speed framerate Higher speed movies 480 fps vs 240 fps
Help
2x higher fps
Aperture Slightly wider aperture f/2.9 vs f/3.0
Help
At its widest zoom, the S8200's lens captures marginally more light (0.1 f-stops)
Viewfinder Has a viewfinder Digital vs None
Help
A viewfinder can help save battery life by keeping the screen turned off
Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Learn more about
the Fujifilm S8200

Advantages of the Nikon L820

Report a correction
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen 921k dots vs 460k dots
Help
More than 2x higher resolution screen
Size Significantly smaller 111x76x85 mm vs 123x87x116 mm
Help
More than 40% smaller
Wide angle Slightly better wide angle 23 mm vs 24 mm
Help
Almost the same
Weight Lighter 470 g vs 670 g
Help
Around 30% lighter
Thickness Thinner 3.3" vs 4.6"
Help
Around 30% thinner
Nikon Coolpix L820 Learn more about
the Nikon L820
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent super zooms, and ignoring price

Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Fujifilm FinePix S8200 72
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        vs

        72 Nikon Coolpix L820 Nikon Coolpix L820
        Retailer
          Style
            Color
              You save

              similarities

              Compared to recent digicams

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
              3D Both can take 3D photos, many cameras like these don't Help
              View photos in 3D on 3D televisions
              High-speed framerate Very high speed movies Help
              S8200:480 fps
              L820:240 fps
              HDR In-camera HDR Help
              Combines multiple exposures
              Macro focus Good macro capabilities Help
              1 cm
              Panorama In-camera panoramas Help
              Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
              Sensor type Better sensor types Help
              Better in low light
              Lowest price Inexpensive Help
              S8200:$179.99
              L820:$168.19
              Thickness Quite thick Help
              S8200:4.6"
              L820:3.3"
              Weight Heavy Help
              S8200:670 g
              L820:470 g
              Size Large Help
              S8200:123x87x116 mm
              L820:111x76x85 mm

              Compared to recent super zooms

              Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

              Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

              External flash No external flash support Help
              Less expandable
              External mic jack Neither has an external mic jack Help
              Limited to the in-camera mic
              Screen flips out No flip-out screens Help
              Less flexible

              competitors

              Shared Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Nikon Coolpix L830

              Super zoom

              $197

              Screen flips out Has a screen which flips out
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Battery life Has a slightly shorter battery life
              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX510 HS

              Super zoom

              $199 - $250

              Supports 24p Records movies in 24p
              Weight Is slightly lighter
              HDR Lacks a built in HDR feature
              Panorama Lacks a built in panoramas
              Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

              Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

              Super zoom

              $188 - $198

              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Thickness Is thicker
              Weight Is slightly heavier
              Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

              Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

              Travel zoom

              $149 - $180

              Size Is slightly smaller
              Thickness Is thinner
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              HDR Lacks a built in HDR feature
              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

              Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

              Super zoom

              $399 - $400

              Zoom Has slightly more zoom
              Supports 24p Records movies in 24p
              Lowest price Is slightly more expensive
              Thickness Is thicker
              Fujifilm FinePix S4800

              Fujifilm FinePix S4800

              Super zoom

              $129 - $139

              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              Battery life Has a significantly shorter battery life
              Fujifilm FinePix S8600

              Fujifilm FinePix S8600

              Super zoom

              $140 - $199

              External mic jack Has an external mic jack
              Thickness Is thinner
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos

              Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Fujifilm FinePix S8500

              Fujifilm FinePix S8500

              Super zoom

              $194

              Zoom More zoom
              Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

              Fujifilm FinePix SL1000

              Super zoom

              $310 - $314

              Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
              Zoom More zoom
              Battery life Significantly shorter battery life
              Size Slightly larger

              Nikon Coolpix L820 Competitors

              Advantages

              Disadvantages

              Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

              Sony CyberShot DSC-H200

              Super zoom

              $239

              Wide angle Slightly better wide angle
              Longest exposure Longer exposures
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Nikon Coolpix L320

              Nikon Coolpix L320

              Super zoom

              $207

              Wide angle Slightly better wide angle
              Weight Slightly lighter
              Screen resolution Much lower resolution screen
              3D Doesn't take 3D photos
              Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

              Canon PowerShot SX500 IS

              Super zoom

              $235 - $274

              Size Smaller
              Weight Lighter
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Screen resolution Significantly lower resolution screen
              Nikon Coolpix L810

              Nikon Coolpix L810

              Super zoom

              $198

              Weight Slightly lighter
              Movie format Lower resolution movies
              Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor

              appearance

              Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Nikon Coolpix L820
              Fujifilm FinePix S8200 Nikon Coolpix L820
              Fujifilm FinePix S8200

              discussion

              Fujifilm FinePix S8200
              FinePix S8200
              Fujifilm

              Report a correction
              Nikon Coolpix L820
              Coolpix L820
              Nikon

              Report a correction

              Showing 1 comments

              penny marshalis (9:59 PM, June 20, 2013)
              How were the scores tallied? Could more of an explanation concerning how evaluation was arrived at be given?