Updated (January 2012): Compare the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

Panasonic Lumix ZS20 vs Casio Exilim EX-ZR10

Winner
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20

43

Casio Exilim EX-ZR10

37

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix ZS20

Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×28 mm)
Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
220 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
480 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
40 fps
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
Weight
Light-weight
176 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-ZR10.
Explore our gallery of 32 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20.

competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$249 - $333

Zoom Significantly more zoom
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Panasonic Lumix ZS30

Travel zoom

$210

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS60 (Lumix DMC-TZ80)

Travel zoom

Movie format Higher resolution movies
Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS8

Travel zoom

$430

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15

Casio Exilim ZR15

Compact

$372

Size Smaller
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Casio EX-ZS20

Casio EX-ZS20

Compact

$129

Size Significantly smaller
Wide angle Better wide angle
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS20
Lumix ZS20
Panasonic

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10
Exilim EX-ZR10
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments