Casio Exilim EX-H20g vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Winner
Casio Exilim EX-H20G

51

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim EX-H20g

Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Casio Exilim EX-H20G.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1.

competitors

Casio Exilim EX-H20G Competitors

Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$290

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Nikon 1 AW1

Nikon 1 AW1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$531 body only

$797 with 11-2mm lens

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS7

Travel zoom

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Longest exposure Significantly longer exposures
Wide angle Worse wide angle

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$250 body only

$900 with 14-45mm lens

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Color depth Better color depth
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$800 - $998 body only

$1,174 with 14-42mm lens

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Movie format Higher resolution movies
Size Larger
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

Color depth Better color depth
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
External flash No external flash support

discussion

Casio Exilim EX-H20G
Exilim EX-H20g
Casio

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Lumix DMC-GX1
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments