Casio Exilim EX-H20g vs Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Winner
Casio Exilim EX-H20G

49

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

34

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim EX-H20g

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Sensor shift
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
Light-weight
Weight
216 g
 

Reasons to buy the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1

Touch screen
Touch screen
Fewer buttons
Movie continuous focus
Movie continuous focus
Makes it easy to get in-focus movies
Shutter lag
Barely any delay taking photos
259 ms shutter lag
Interchangeable lenses
Interchangeable lenses
Many lenses to choose from

galleries

Explore our gallery of 1 sample photo taken by the Casio Exilim EX-H20G.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1.

competitors

Casio Exilim EX-H20G Competitors

Casio Exilim EX-H15

Casio Exilim EX-H15

Travel zoom

Weight Slightly lighter
GPS No built-in GPS
Canon PowerShot G12

Canon PowerShot G12

Pro digicam

$650

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Wide angle Significantly worse wide angle
Nikon AW130

Nikon AW130

Waterproof

$249 - $347

Screen type Has an OLED screen
Image stabilization Better image stabilization

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$250 body only

$900 with 14-45mm lens

Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Color depth Better color depth
Movie continuous focus Doesn't focus continuously recording movies
Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Sony Cybershot DSC-RX100

Pro digicam

$448

Image stabilization Image stabilization
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay
Fujifilm X-M1

Fujifilm X-M1

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$779 body only

Screen resolution Higher resolution screen
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Startup delay Much more startup delay

discussion

Casio Exilim EX-H20G
Exilim EX-H20g
Casio

Report a correction
Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1
Lumix DMC-GX1
Panasonic

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments