Updated (February 2011): Compare the Casio Exilim EX-FH100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

45

Casio Exilim EX-FH100

38

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
9.5 fps
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm
Size
Really small
Compact (104×60×28 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,000 fps
Thickness
Thin
1.1"

galleries

Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-FH100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$160 - $227

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

Zoom Significantly more zoom
GPS Has a GPS
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX50

Sony Cyber-shot WX50

Ultra compact

$146

Size Much smaller
Aperture Significantly wider aperture
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Casio Exilim EX-FH100 Competitors

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3

Pro digicam

$300

Aperture Significantly wider aperture
Macro focus Much better macro capability
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-FH25

Casio Exilim EX-FH25

Super zoom

$1,329

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Macro focus Much better macro capability
Size Much larger
Canon ELPH 300 HS

Canon ELPH 300 HS

Compact

$275

Size Significantly smaller
Aperture Wider aperture
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-FH100
Exilim EX-FH100
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments