Updated (February 2011): Compare the Casio Exilim EX-FH100 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

44

Casio Exilim EX-FH100

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
9.5 fps
Really small
Size
Compact (105×62×35 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Thin
Thickness
1.4"
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Size
Really small
Compact (104×60×28 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,000 fps
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
Weight
Light-weight
201 g

galleries

Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-FH100.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$139 - $227

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

GPS Has a GPS
Zoom Significantly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$428 - $449

Aperture Much wider aperture
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Casio Exilim EX-FH100 Competitors

Samsung NX Mini

Samsung NX Mini

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$191 body only

$399 with 9-27mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Travel zoom

$296

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Significantly larger
Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Fujifilm FinePix F80EXR

Travel zoom

$400

Lowest price Much cheaper
Size Slightly smaller
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-FH100
Exilim EX-FH100
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments