vs

Casio QV-R200

49

Casio QV-R200

Tie
     
 

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm FinePix JX300

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.6
Size
Really small
Super compact 94x55x23 mm
Thickness
Thin
0.9"
Weight
Light-weight
130 g
 

Reasons to buy the Casio QV-R200

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.8
Size
Really small
Compact 99x57x23 mm
Thickness
Thin
0.9"
Weight
Light-weight
130 g
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Casio QV-R200

Report a correction
Macro focus Much better macro capability 5 cm vs 10 cm
Help
Focus on subjects 2x closer to the lens
Wide angle Better wide angle 26 mm vs 28 mm
Help
Around 10% better wide angle
Casio QV-R200 Learn more about
the Casio QV-R200

Advantages of the Fujifilm JX300

Report a correction
Aperture Wider aperture f/2.6 vs f/2.8
Help
At its widest zoom, the JX300's lens captures marginally more light (0.2 f-stops)
Size Slightly smaller 94x55x23 mm vs 99x57x23 mm
Help
Around 10% smaller
Longest exposure Longer exposures 8s vs 1s
Help
8x longer exposures
Fujifilm FinePix JX300 Learn more about
the Fujifilm JX300
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent compacts, and ignoring price

Casio QV-R200 Casio QV-R200 49

vs

50 Fujifilm FinePix JX300 Fujifilm FinePix JX300
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        similarities

        Compared to recent compacts

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses
        Size Fairly small Help
        QV-R200:99x57x23 mm
        JX300:94x55x23 mm
        Weight Light weight Help
        130 g
        Thickness Thin Help
        0.9"
        Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
        CCD
        Supports RAW No RAW support Help
        Less editing fidelity
        Macro focus Poor macro capabilities Help
        QV-R200:5 cm
        JX300:10 cm
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        1,600 ISO
        Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
        230k dots
        Screen size Very small screens Help
        2.7"
        Movie format HD (720p) video Help
        QV-R200:720p
        JX300:720p @ 30fps
        Zoom Poor zoom Help
        5x

        competitors

        Shared Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Canon PowerShot A810

        Canon PowerShot A810

        Compact

        $143

        Macro focus Slightly closer macro focusing
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is slightly heavier
        Fujifilm Finepix JX500

        Fujifilm Finepix JX500

        Compact

        Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
        Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
        Fujifilm FinePix JX400

        Fujifilm FinePix JX400

        Compact

        Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
        Sony Cybershot DSC-W610

        Sony Cybershot DSC-W610

        Ultra compact

        Size Is slightly smaller
        Panorama Creates panoramas in-camera
        Image stabilization Doesn't have image stabilization
        Movie format Records lower quality movies
        Fujifilm FinePix AX350

        Fujifilm FinePix AX350

        Compact

        $106

        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is slightly heavier

        Casio QV-R200 Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Casio Exilim EX-ZS6

        Casio Exilim ZS6

        Compact

        $141

        Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
        Size Smaller
        Casio Exilim EX-S10

        Casio Exilim EX-S10

        Ultra compact

        Size Smaller
        Thickness Thinner
        Wide angle Much worse wide angle
        Macro focus Much worse macro capability
        Casio Exilim EX-ZR15

        Casio Exilim ZR15

        Compact

        High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
        Movie format Higher resolution movies
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Aperture Narrower aperture
        Nikon Coolpix S3300

        Nikon Coolpix S3300

        Compact

        $372

        Size Smaller
        Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
        Aperture Narrower aperture
        Battery life Slightly shorter battery life
        Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

        Canon PowerShot SD1400 IS

        Ultra compact

        Size Smaller
        Macro focus Better macro capability
        Wide angle Worse wide angle

        Fujifilm FinePix JX300 Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Nikon Coolpix S3600

        Nikon Coolpix S3600

        Travel zoom

        $87

        Macro focus Much better macro capability
        Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
        Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
        Longest exposure Slightly shorter max exposures
        Nikon Coolpix S9500

        Nikon Coolpix S9500

        Travel zoom

        $217

        Zoom Much more zoom
        Screen type Has an OLED screen
        Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
        Size Significantly larger
        Nikon Coolpix S9400

        Nikon Coolpix S9400

        Travel zoom

        $240 - $322

        Screen type Has an OLED screen
        Zoom Significantly more zoom
        Aperture Significantly narrower aperture
        Size Significantly larger
        Fujifilm FinePix S8200

        Fujifilm FinePix S8200

        Super zoom

        $190 - $215

        Zoom Much more zoom
        High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
        Size Much larger
        Thickness Much thicker
        Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

        Sony CyberShot DSC-W800

        Ultra compact

        $78

        Size Significantly smaller
        Panorama Can create panoramas in-camera
        Aperture Narrower aperture
        Thickness Much thicker

        appearance

        Casio QV-R200 Fujifilm FinePix JX300
        Casio QV-R200 Fujifilm FinePix JX300
        Casio QV-R200 Fujifilm FinePix JX300

        discussion

        Casio QV-R200
        QV-R200
        Casio

        Report a correction
        Fujifilm FinePix JX300
        FinePix JX300
        Fujifilm

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments