Updated (February 2012): Compare the Casio Exilim EX-ZR200 vs Nikon Coolpix P510

Nikon Coolpix P510 vs Casio Exilim ZR-200

Winner
Nikon Coolpix P510

62

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200

52

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix P510

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Built-in GPS
GPS
Great for travel
Great viewfinder
Viewfinder
Digital
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim ZR-200

Size
Really small
Compact (105×59×29 mm)
High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,000 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
30 fps
Battery life
Great battery life
480 shots

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-ZR200.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix P510.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix P510 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix P900

Nikon Coolpix P900

Super zoom

$449 - $597

Zoom Much more zoom
Battery life Much longer battery life
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix P500

Nikon Coolpix P500

Super zoom

$599

High-speed framerate Higher speed movies
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
GPS No built-in GPS
Nikon Coolpix P530

Nikon Coolpix P530

Super zoom

$335

Battery life Longer battery life
Weight Slightly lighter
GPS No built-in GPS

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200 Competitors

Canon ELPH 510 HS

Canon ELPH 510 HS

Travel zoom

$240

Screen size Significantly larger screen
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50

Travel zoom

$276 - $279

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-ZR5000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR5000

Digicam

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Battery life Shorter battery life

discussion

Nikon Coolpix P510
Coolpix P510
Nikon

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-ZR200
Exilim ZR-200
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments