Casio Exilim ZR100 vs Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim ZR100

Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×29 mm)
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
Thin
Thickness
1.1"
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,200 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
60 fps
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Better editing
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-ZR100.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1.

competitors

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-ZR200

Casio Exilim ZR-200

Travel zoom

$315

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Cheaper
Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
Nikon D3200

Nikon D3200

Entry-level DSLR

$393 body only

$426 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 Competitors

Nikon D610

Nikon D610

Pro DSLR

$1,175 - $1,497 body only

$1,570 - $1,997 with 24-85mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Pentax K-x

Pentax K-x

Entry-level DSLR

$600 with 18-55mm lens

Supports 24p Supports 24p
Autofocus Faster autofocus
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-100

Casio Exilim EX-100

Pro digicam

$505

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
Exilim ZR100
Casio

Report a correction
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
Exilim Pro EX-F1
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments