Casio Exilim ZR100 vs Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim ZR100

Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×29 mm)
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1

High-speed framerate
High speed movies
1,200 fps
Continuous shooting
Rapid fire
60 fps
Supports RAW
Shoots RAW
Better editing
Viewfinder
Great viewfinder
Digital

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-ZR100.
Explore our gallery of 9 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1.

competitors

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 Competitors

Casio Exilim EX-ZR200

Casio Exilim ZR-200

Travel zoom

$401

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Slightly cheaper
Panorama Lacks in-camera panoramic stitching
Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Canon PowerShot ELPH 170 IS

Travel zoom

$139

Image stabilization Better image stabilization
Lowest price Cheaper
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$629 body only

$449 with 15-45mm lens

Screen resolution Significantly higher resolution screen
Supports 24p Supports 24p
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1 Competitors

Sony Alpha DSLR-A580

Sony Alpha DSLR-A580

Entry-level DSLR

3D Takes 3D photos
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-FH20

Casio Exilim EX-FH20

Super zoom

$1,090

Wide angle Much better wide angle
Screen size Significantly larger screen
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-100

Casio Exilim EX-100

Pro digicam

$497

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
High-speed framerate Lower speed movies

discussion

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
Exilim ZR100
Casio

Report a correction
Casio Exilim Pro EX-F1
Exilim Pro EX-F1
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments