Updated (February 2011): Compare the Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 vs Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Casio Exilim ZR100 vs Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Winner
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100

41

Casio Exilim EX-FH100

36

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim ZR100

Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
40 fps
Wide angle lens
Wide angle
24 mm
Really small
Size
Compact (105×59×29 mm)
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
1,000 fps
 

Reasons to buy the Casio Exilim EX-FH100

Size
Really small
Compact (104×60×28 mm)
Thickness
Thin
1.1"
Longest exposure
Long exposures
30 seconds
Wide angle
Wide angle lens
24 mm

galleries

Explore our gallery of 5 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-ZR100.
Explore our gallery of 3 sample photos taken by the Casio Exilim EX-FH100.

competitors

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 Competitors

Canon EOS M10

Canon EOS M10

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$439 - $449 with 15-45mm lens

Autofocus Faster autofocus
Light sensitivity Better maximum light sensitivity
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim ZR400

Casio Exilim ZR400

Travel zoom

$210

Battery life Longer battery life
Continuous shooting Shoots much slower
Casio Exilim EX-ZR300

Casio Exilim EX-ZR300

Travel zoom

$187

Battery life Longer battery life
Lowest price Slightly cheaper

Casio Exilim EX-FH100 Competitors

Samsung NX Mini

Samsung NX Mini

Mirrorless interchangeable-lens

$191 body only

$399 with 9mm lens

Touch screen Has a touch screen
True resolution Much higher true resolution
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000

Travel zoom

$296

Continuous shooting Shoots much faster
Screen flips out Has a flip-out screen
Size Significantly larger
Canon PowerShot G7 X

Canon PowerShot G7 X

Pro digicam

$528 - $649

Aperture Much wider aperture
Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

discussion

Casio Exilim EX-ZR100
Exilim ZR100
Casio

Report a correction
Casio Exilim EX-FH100
Exilim EX-FH100
Casio

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments