Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX vs Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Winner
Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

50

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

46

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX

Large screen
Screen size
3"
CMOS Sensor
Sensor type
Better in low light
In-camera HDR
HDR
Combines multiple exposures
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX30 IS

Aperture
Wide aperture
f/2.7
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies
External flash
External flash
Better lighting
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX30 IS.
Explore our gallery of 44 sample photos taken by the Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX.

competitors

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX Competitors

Nikon D7200

Nikon D7200

Entry-level DSLR

$789 - $997 body only

$1,100 - $1,297 with 18-140mm lens

Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
Screen size Significantly larger screen
Image stabilization No image stabilization
Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Sony CyberShot DSC-H300

Super zoom

$170 - $180

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Zoom More zoom
Sensor type Has a CCD-family sensor
Kodak PixPro AZ521

Kodak PixPro AZ521

Super zoom

$281

Zoom Much more zoom
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Slightly narrower aperture

Canon PowerShot SX30 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$419 - $479

Zoom Much more zoom
High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

Super zoom

$389

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

Canon PowerShot SX400 IS

Super zoom

$149

Screen size Much larger screen
Size Significantly smaller
Aperture Narrower aperture

discussion

Kodak Easyshare Z990 MAX
Easyshare Z990 MAX
Kodak

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX30 IS
PowerShot SX30 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments