Updated (February 2011): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS vs Nikon Coolpix S9100

Nikon Coolpix S9100 vs Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Winner
Nikon Coolpix S9100

44

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

39

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Nikon Coolpix S9100

High resolution screen
Screen resolution
921k dots
High speed movies
High-speed framerate
240 fps
Rapid fire
Continuous shooting
9.5 fps
Light-weight
Weight
214 g
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Size
Really small
Compact (106×59×32 mm)
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Fastest shutter speed
Fast shutter speed
1/3200 of a second

galleries

Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Nikon Coolpix S9100.

competitors

Nikon Coolpix S9100 Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$139 - $227

Size Significantly smaller
Image stabilization Better image stabilization
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Nikon Coolpix S9900

Nikon Coolpix S9900

Travel zoom

$249

GPS Has a GPS
Zoom Significantly more zoom
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies
Canon PowerShot G9 X

Canon PowerShot G9 X

Pro digicam

$428 - $449

Aperture Much wider aperture
Touch screen Has a touch screen
High-speed framerate Doesn't record high-speed movies

Canon PowerShot SX210 IS Competitors

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Nikon Coolpix S7000

Travel zoom

$139 - $227

Wide angle Significantly better wide angle
Sensor type Has a CMOS-family sensor
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

Travel zoom

$392

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Supports 24p Supports 24p
Size Slightly larger
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

Travel zoom

$237

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
GPS Has a GPS
Size Slightly larger

discussion

Nikon Coolpix S9100
Coolpix S9100
Nikon

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
PowerShot SX210 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments