Fujifilm X-S1 vs Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Winner
Fujifilm X-S1

56

Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

42

Runner-up

Reasons to buy the Fujifilm X-S1

Large screen
Screen size
3"
Wide dynamic range
Dynamic range
11.2 EV
In-camera panoramas
Panorama
Stitches together multiple photos into a panorama
External mic jack
External mic jack
Record higher quality audio with a microphone
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS

Size
Really small
Prosumer size (128×88×87 mm)
Thickness
Thin
3.4"
Image stabilization
Image stabilization
  1. Lens
Screen flips out
Flip-out screen
Great for movies

galleries

Explore our gallery of 49 sample photos taken by the Canon PowerShot SX20 IS.
Explore our gallery of 50 sample photos taken by the Fujifilm X-S1.

competitors

Fujifilm X-S1 Competitors

Fujifilm FinePix S1

Fujifilm FinePix S1

Super zoom

$500

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Zoom Significantly more zoom
Image stabilization Worse image stabilization
Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR

Super zoom

$568

High-speed framerate Records high-speed movies
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Sensor size Smaller sensor
Canon Rebel SL1

Canon Rebel SL1

Entry-level DSLR

$349 - $399 body only

$429 - $509 with 18-55mm lens

Size Much smaller
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization

Canon PowerShot SX20 IS Competitors

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS

Canon PowerShot SX420 IS

Super zoom

$260 - $299

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Canon PowerShot SX60 HS

Super zoom

$398 - $479

Screen size Much larger screen
Wide angle Much better wide angle
Aperture Narrower aperture
Canon EOS Rebel T5

Canon EOS Rebel T5

Entry-level DSLR

$279 body only

$330 - $399 with 18-55mm lens

Screen size Much larger screen
Autofocus Faster autofocus
Image stabilization No image stabilization

discussion

Fujifilm X-S1
X-S1
Fujifilm

Report a correction
Canon PowerShot SX20 IS
PowerShot SX20 IS
Canon

Report a correction

Showing 0 comments