Updated (February, 2011): Compare the Canon PowerShot SX200 IS vs Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

vs

     
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

Size
Really small
Compact 105x59x31 mm
Thickness
Thin
1.3"
Weight
Light-weight
220 g
 

Reasons to buy the Canon PowerShot SX200 IS

Size
Really small
Compact 103x61x38 mm
Macro focus
Great macro
0 cm
Weight
Light-weight
220 g
 
Differences | Recommendations | Cast your vote | Similarities | Competitors | Appearance | Discussion

differences

Advantages of the Canon SX200 IS

Report a correction
Macro focus Much better macro capability 0 cm vs 5 cm
Help
Almost the same
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Learn more about
the Canon SX200 IS

Advantages of the Canon SX210 IS

Report a correction
Aperture Wider aperture f/3.1 vs f/3.4
Help
At its widest zoom, the SX210 IS's lens captures marginally more light (0.3 f-stops)
Size Smaller 105x59x31 mm vs 103x61x38 mm
Help
Around 20% smaller
Zoom Slightly more zoom 14x vs 12x
Help
Around 40% more zoom
Thickness Thinner 1.3" vs 1.5"
Help
Around 20% thinner
Canon PowerShot SX210 IS Learn more about
the Canon SX210 IS
vs

recommendations

Which camera do we recommend? Relative to the best recent travel zooms, and ignoring price

Snapsort Recommends
Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Canon PowerShot SX200 IS 51

vs

54 Canon PowerShot SX210 IS Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
Retailer
    Style
      Color
        You save

        similarities

        Compared to recent compacts

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

        Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

        Light sensitivity (boost) No boost ISO Help
        Lacks boost light sensitivity
        Shutter lag Significant shutter lag Help
        SX200 IS:460 ms
        SX210 IS:390 ms
        Weight Heavy Help
        220 g
        Panorama Neither camera stitches together panoramas Help
        You could stitch photos in post
        Sensor type Lower-end sensor types Help
        CCD
        Supports RAW No RAW support Help
        Less editing fidelity
        HDR Neither has in-camera HDR Help
        You could do HDR manually
        Light sensitivity Poor maximum light sensitivity Help
        1,600 ISO
        Screen resolution Low resolution screens Help
        230k dots
        Size Large Help
        SX200 IS:103x61x38 mm
        SX210 IS:105x59x31 mm
        Wide angle Poor wide angle Help
        28 mm
        Movie format Both shoot high resolution HD movies Help
        720p @ 30fps

        Compared to recent travel zooms

        Common Strengths Common Weaknesses

        Snapsort is not aware of any interesting strengths shared by these two products.

        Touch screen No touchscreens Help
        More buttons
        High-speed framerate No high speed movie support Help
        Not supported
        Zoom Poor zoom Help
        SX200 IS:12x
        SX210 IS:14x

        competitors

        Shared Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX220 HS

        Travel zoom

        $290

        Movie format Records higher quality movies
        Screen resolution Has a slightly higher resolution screen
        Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
        Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX230 HS

        Travel zoom

        $200

        GPS Has a built-in GPS
        Movie format Records higher quality movies
        Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
        Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

        Canon PowerShot SX170 IS

        Travel zoom

        $149 - $180

        Lowest price Is significantly less expensive
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is slightly heavier
        Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

        Travel zoom

        $299 - $350

        Zoom Has way more more zoom
        Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
        Weight Is slightly heavier
        Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing
        Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX50 HS

        Super zoom

        $399 - $400

        Zoom Has way more more zoom
        Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is much heavier
        Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

        Canon PowerShot SX150 IS

        Travel zoom

        $130

        Lowest price Is significantly less expensive
        Thickness Is thicker
        Weight Is significantly heavier
        Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX260 HS

        Travel zoom

        $200 - $300

        Zoom Has slightly more zoom
        Wide angle Has a slightly wider wide angle lens
        Shutter lag Has significantly more shutter lag
        Macro focus Significantly worse macro focusing

        Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Nikon Coolpix S8000

        Nikon Coolpix S8000

        Travel zoom

        $200

        Screen resolution Much higher resolution screen
        Size Significantly smaller
        Wide angle Worse wide angle
        Macro focus Worse macro capability
        Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX280 HS

        Travel zoom

        $320

        GPS Has a GPS
        Zoom More zoom
        Macro focus Much worse macro capability
        Aperture Slightly narrower aperture

        Canon PowerShot SX210 IS Competitors

        Advantages

        Disadvantages

        Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

        Canon PowerShot SX600 HS

        Travel zoom

        $199 - $259

        Movie format Higher resolution movies
        Wide angle Better wide angle
        Aperture Narrower aperture

        appearance

        Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
        Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
        Canon PowerShot SX200 IS Canon PowerShot SX210 IS

        discussion

        Canon PowerShot SX200 IS
        PowerShot SX200 IS
        Canon

        Report a correction
        Canon PowerShot SX210 IS
        PowerShot SX210 IS
        Canon

        Report a correction

        Showing 0 comments